Fr. Ripperger graciously did an interview on the topic of vaccinations and the morality of them/ We touched on topics of fetal cells to the COVID vaccines. This is probably too spicy for YouTube to post it there so I put it on other platforms
WATCH ON: Odessy / Bitchute / LBRY / UGEtube / Rumble / BrandNewTube
Click any of the above platforms to watch the interview
Steve, where’s your coffee ( .. tea, water, whiskey)? The expression on your face tells
this viewer a coffee/tea etc. would ease the strain while Fr. R and Grant hammer out
the details of the formal statements put out by Bishops and pertinent bodies.
Kids had me up early and I didn’t want to bust out an energy drink yet
A much-needed “unpacking” of the “Faith and Morals” component in Ecclesiastical and
other pertinent statements on Vaccination. Thank you all!
Do you happen to have a transcript of this episode? I’d love to have it to refute and refuse the covid 19 vaccine.
I do not. Just audio. Now the book that Pam Ackers wrote may be beneficial …. https://www.kolbecenter.org/product/vaccination-a-catholic-perspective/
Your kids have a good Dad. Thanks for taking the time. Grandpa Bob & Grandma Elizabeth.
Is there a transcript available? An hour is a bit long for my available time.
there isn’t one
I wish I could transcribe for you. I’m retired from medical transcription. Don’t know where you’re located, I’m in SW PA. Thanks.
If there is, I haven’t got it. Do you, Sensus Fidelium, not have one? What about contacting
the host of this three-way conversation? .. Grant Ryan? Cheers anyway. Bob S.
Fr Chad’s comments on Covid vaccines have been strongly refuted by Fr Mathew Schneider at
https://www.patheos.com/blogs/throughcatholiclenses/author/mschneider/.
What are Fr Chad’s thoughts on this refutation.
Fr Schneider didn’t refute anything. He gave a bad attempt at refuting
This answer does not constitute a cogent reply. You have not addressed any of the arguments presented.
Eg
42:02: “Then there’s the third kind: those which modify one’s DNA.”
He goes way in-depth on this, but this type of vaccine doesn’t exist. No vaccine – COVID or otherwise – modifies or changes your DNA in any meaningful way or any way that is dangerous
40:15: “Not derived from aborted fetal tissue… They developed a protein from that cell line, but then that protein is removed. That protein is what’s inserted into the virus in order to debilitate it if I understand that correctly. Then it’s tested and produced again in the cell line.” He then says this refers to Moderna.
This is so rather far from what Moderna did. Scientists decoded the RNA of SARS-CoV-2 (the virus causing COIVD-19) and parsed out which genes made which parts. Some of this initial research was done using HEK293 cells. From that, an annotated genome of the virus was published. From this, Moderna and Pfizer took the RNA sequence for the external spike protein of the virus and manufactured RNA artificially.
More could he cited. In essence a blanket rejection is not a proper form of argument. Precision is required, not a one sentence rejection.
I’ve mentioned way more than one sentence to that priest and he rejects it. I’ve cited scores of links to him. I have plenty on this. Moderna does have, in fact, mRNA that is changing of DNA this is well known. For him to say no is rejection of reality. Go look it up yourself. I mean it’s even on the Moderna website.
40:15 not derived from aborted fetal tissue. His flawed opinion. Would you care to check out Pam Acker’s response to that? That priest won’t dare respond to her I notice. If you want to say the experimental injection (bc that is what it is… not a vaccine but an EXPERIMENTAL INJECTION) as it is being tested on humans after skipping safety trials (fact) and you have people dying and being messed up from this (more fact) than good luck. Any that cannot honestly see that is not worth listening to.
Moderna’s mRNA stays in the cytoplasm.
It does not enter the nucleus.
DNA is in the nucleus.
mRNA reproduces via cytoplasm ribosome only.
According to the CDC:
Facts about COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines
They cannot give someone COVID-19.
mRNA vaccines do not use the live virus that causes COVID-19.
They do not affect or interact with our DNA in any way.
mRNA never enters the nucleus of the cell, which is where our DNA (genetic material) is kept.
The cell breaks down and gets rid of the mRNA soon after it is finished using the instructions.
Also:
Some of the newly created vaccines, including the one now approved in the UK developed by Pfizer/BioNTech, use a fragment of the virus’s genetic material – or messenger RNA.
“Injecting RNA into a person doesn’t do anything to the DNA of a human cell,” says Prof Jeffrey Almond of Oxford University.
It works by giving the body instructions to produce a protein which is present on the surface of the coronavirus.
The immune system then learns to recognise and produce antibodies against the protein.
Seems to me they don’t know long-term effects. Remember thalidomide.
Hank Aaron, home run king, dies 18 days after receiving modeRNA vaccine, of …cough, … “undisclosed cause.”
Hi. There is now a transcript provided by WQPH Catholic Radio for all interested. http://wqphradio.org/2021/02/14/father-ripperger-on-covid-vaccine/
Sensus Fidelium had an excellent video on YouTube titled COVID vaccines: May we? Should we? Must we? It was maybe the best presentation on the issue I have seen. It was pulled for violating YouTube’s standards. It informed people and encouraged them to prayerfully think. I want to request that presentation to be uploaded to this site or Rumble, or both. I am grateful to have seen it while it was available, and I would love to share it with others. God bless!
https://odysee.com/@SensusFidelium:c/covid-vaccines-may-we-should-we-must-we:3 it’s on LBRY & Odysee
Seems most human reason or ‘right reason’ is gone. No logical person (let alone medical professional) would consider injecting an experimental chemical (technically, it is not a vax) into a person who has a 99% chance of recovery, especially when unscrupulous politicians are pushing it on us. Trust in God and the immune system He designed, not in Bill Gates!
Well said!
Technically, it is a vaccine: “Vaccine: A product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease, protecting the person from that disease. Vaccines are usually administered through needle injections, but can also be administered by mouth or sprayed into the nose.” https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vac-gen/imz-basics.htm
And do you Trust in God when it comes to hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, MRSA, kidney disease stage 5, diabetes type 1 with a HbA1c = 22%, glaucoma, familial hyperlipidaemia etc etc ?
God gave us reason to use to remediate human suffer. C-19 vaccine is a marvelous use of that reason.
It isn’t in the same ballpark as what a vaccine is. By their OWN words it is an experimental injection. mRNA isn’t a ‘vaccine’ it’s a GMO for the body
You do not know what you are trying to speak about. References to ‘ballpark’ are meaningless without a context.
A vaccine works by training the immune system to recognize and combat pathogens, either viruses or bacteria. To do this, certain molecules from the pathogen must be introduced into the body to trigger an immune response.
These molecules are called antigens, and they are present on all viruses and bacteria. By injecting these antigens into the body, the immune system can safely learn to recognize them as hostile invaders, produce antibodies, and remember them for the future. If the bacteria or virus reappears, the immune system will recognize the antigens immediately and attack aggressively well before the pathogen can spread and cause sickness.
The Oxford vaccine is a viral vector vaccine. These vaccines are similar to DNA vaccines in that they introduce DNA from a harmful pathogen into the body, triggering the immune system to produce antigens and train itself to identify and combat the disease. The difference is that these vaccines use an attenuated, or weakened, virus or bacterium as a ride, or vector, for the DNA. In essence, scientists are able to take a harmless pathogen, dress it in the DNA of a more dangerous disease, and train the body to recognize and fight both effectively.